.
An
influential member of the international Rothschild
banking dynasty — often called “the
family that rules the world” — has
lent her support to the theme that Barack Obama
must be removed from the White House and that
America needs a grand “centrist” coalition
to save the nation. That a key Rothschild network
figure endorsed this concept — which is
being relentlessly promoted in the pages of The
New York Times and The Washington Post
— underscores recent exclusive reports appearing
in AMERICAN FREE
PRESS detailing a high-level
scheme to foist a phony new “centrist”
third party on Americans.
In
2008, lifelong Democrat Lynn Forester de Rothschild
endorsed GOP presidential candidate John McCain
after the Democratic Party rejected de Rothschild’s
first choice, Hillary Clinton.
The
American-born Lady Rothschild — chief executive
of E. L. Rothschild, a key Rothschild holding
company — is the wife of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild.
She was first introduced to her husband in Scotland
in 1998 by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger
during a meeting of Bilderberg — the global
planning group dominated by the Rothschilds, assisted
by their American lieutenants, the Rockefellers.
Endorsing
McCain, Mrs. Rothschild proclaimed Obama too “ideological”
— that is, too “liberal” —
an interesting assertion coming from a stalwart
Democrat. Now Mrs. Rothschild is once again aiming
her guns at Obama, echoing the very rhetoric about
the need to adopt “centrist” policies
prevalent in all of the recent propaganda in the
elite press that AFP — alone among the independent
media — has been scrutinizing.
She
expressed her “centrist” concerns
on the Internet’s Daily Beast on
Feb. 28, 2010, but few noticed it at the time.
It’s no coincidence this was the forum she
used to vent her attack: the Daily Beast
is merging with the Rothschild-connected Washington
Post Company’s Newsweek magazine,
recently transferred to the control of Zionist
billionaire Sidney Harman, who — like the
Rothschild dynasty — is a major patron of
Israel.
In
her commentary, Mrs. Rothschild declared: “After
watching President Obama in office for more than
a year, it is clear to me that . . . we already
knew what kind of president he would become. .
. . Perhaps the biggest fabrication of the Obama
candidacy was his claim of being a centrist.”
Mrs. Rothschild wrote:
Sure,
[Obama] made promises during the campaign that
pleased moderates. . . . They were specific,
sensible promises — ones that enabled
him to mislead the electorate about his real
plans for America. . . .
At
the time, it was obvious that a candidate who
won the primary because of the left would be
beholden to the left, no matter what promises
he made to get elected. . . . In The Audacity
of Hope, he criticized Bill Clinton for
giving too much respect to Ronald Reagan. He
asked the Democratic Leadership Council, the
centrist Democratic group, to remove his name
from their lists. So if he wasn’t going
to be a centrist Democrat in the tradition of
Bill Clinton, what did Barack Obama want from
his presidency, should he be elected?
He
told us from the beginning. It was a stunning
agenda, but it seemed innocuous, even inspiring,
during the campaign . . . . Obama declared he
was running “not just to hold an office,
but to gather with you to transform a nation.”
Suddenly now everyone is worried he is trying
to transform America. . . . His is an effort
to make a bigger, more intrusive and more costly
government. His hope is, and has always been,
to turn the country into a nation that looks
more like a European social democracy. He ignores
that the roots of our strength have always been
small government and a dynamic private sector,
fostered by both Democrats and Republicans.
His cynical use of centrist language as a tool
to get elected does not change the fact of his
true objectives.
Our
central problem is that the combination of his
grandiloquence and the September 2008 financial
crisis led to his election. Now, the only way
to stop him in the next three years is through
voter pressure on Congress. One course is to
follow Massachusetts and just elect any Republican.
But both parties lack courageous leaders who
will fight for the values and policies of the
middle.
While
it certainly confuses many people (particularly
self-styled “patriots” and “conservatives”)
that Mrs. Rothschild (and like-minded associates
in the mass media) call the Clintons “moderates,”
that has, in fact, been a continuing premise in
the media, especially of recent date, as if the
stage is being set for a return of “Bill
and Hill” in the form of a “centrist”
challenge to Obama.
“His
cynical use of
centrist language as a
tool to get elected does
not change the fact of
his true objectives.”
|
However,
note that Mrs. Rothschild denounced not just Obama
but “both parties.” Her rhetoric precisely
reflects ongoing high-level calls in the media
monopoly for a “centrist” rebellion
against both “the left” and “the
right”:
We
need a movement of the militant middle; millions
of voters who support the sensible policies
from both parties.
This
would give Democrats political cover to stand
up to Obama, Pelosi and Reid; and Republicans
the backbone to acknowledge that the country
must progress in order to be strong.
Here
is what’s happening: Recognizing growing
widespread disgust with both major parties, the
elite big money forces seem to be laying the groundwork
to usher in a new “centrist” party
— a “controlled opposition”
under their domination — to block the rise
of any genuine populist third party challenging
their power.
The
war-profiteering plutocratic elites want to be
assured that — in the face of growing opposition
from Americans on both the “left”
and the “right” — budget-busting
internationalist policies promoting U.S. military
adventurism in the Middle East and across the
globe — in the name of what is now being
touted as American “national greatness”
— will be preserved.
In
fact, the “national greatness” concept
is just a patriotic-sounding cover name for what
many call the New World Order.
Note,
too, that although both “liberal Democrats”
and “conservative Republicans” have
done big money’s bidding for a century,
a new “centrist” force — orchestrated
by the major media (owned by the financial aristocracy)
— would shatter the existing traditional
local, state and federal political machines of
the major parties which are closely tied to their
own respective constituencies (small business,
farmers, public employees, minorities, factory
workers, etc). Divorced from grassroots demands,
the new “centrist” mechanism would
answer only to the major media controllers who
conjured up the “centrist” party in
the first place.
* * * * * * *
. . ..Michael Collins Piper
can be heard every week day night
live on the Internet at republicbroadcasting.org.
He is the author of Final
Judgment, the controversial
“underground bestseller”
documenting the collaboration of Israeli
intelligence in the assassination
of John F. Kennedy. He is also the
author of The
High Priests of War,
The
New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America
, The
Judas Goats: The Enemy Within,
Dirty
Secrets: Crime, Conspiracy & Cover-Up
in the 20th Century,
The
GOLEM: Israel's Hell Bomb,
and Target:
Traficant. These
works can be found at America
First Books and FIRST
AMENDMENT
BOOKS: 1-888-699-NEWS.
He has lectured on suppressed
topics in places as diverse as Malaysia,
Japan, Canada, Russia and Abu Dhabi. |
|
(Issue #49/50, Dec 6 & 13,
2010, AMERICAN
FREE PRESS)
* * * * * * *
Additional references from
the Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild web
page at The Daily Beast
2010-02-28 I
Told You So by Lady
Lynn Forester de Rothschild, The Daily Beast,
"Obama’s shortcomings were eminently
foreseeable, says one of McCain's most prominent
Democratic backers. Lynn Forester de Rothschild
on how the president's fake bipartisanship could
never hide his true leftist agenda."
2008-10-13 A
Democrat In Defense of Sarah Palin,
The Daily Beast, 'Palin’s views on
abortion and gay rights have been distorted by
Democratic Party scare tactics. As a Democrat
supporting John McCain, I am most often questioned
about Sarah Palin. I have two simple responses..."
|
Lady de Rothschild
is chief executive of E.L. Rothschild LLC,
a private investment company. She is a director
of the Estee Lauder Cos. and The Economist
Newspaper Ltd.
|
