By Michael Collins
Piper
 |
. At the height of a growing frenzy among American
friends of Israel who demand the United
States attack Iran, a leader of the Jewish
community publicly called for Israel’s Mossad
to assassinate President Barack
Obama in order to save Israel from
Iran.
On Jan. 13, Andrew Adler, editor
and publisher of The Atlanta Jewish
Times — joining an ever-more-boisterous
chorus of angry voices —
wrote a column declaring Israel had
three options (all violent) to ensure
its security. The first option was to
attack its enemies in Hezbollah and Hamas. The second
was to attack Iran. The third option: “Give the go-ahead
for U.S.-based Mossad agents to take out a
president deemed unfriendly to Israel in order for the
current vice president to take his place, and forcefully
dictate that the United States’ policy includes its helping
the Jewish state obliterate its enemies.”
To ensure readers understood what he was saying,
Adler underscored his call for Obama’s murder, writing:“Yes, you read [that] correctly. Order a hit on a
president in order to preserve Israel’s existence.”
He added: “Think about it. If I have thought of this
Tom Clancy-type scenario, don’t you think that this almost
unfathomable idea has been discussed in Israel’s
most inner circles? . . . You have got to believe, like I
do, that all options are on the table.”
News of this open call by a Jewish
leader for the president’s assassination
did not receive any notice outside
the Jewish community until
after an independent Internet website
discovered the story and publicized
it. In fact, most major news
outlets completely suppressed this
important story.
Forced by public outrage to comment, other Jewish
leaders asserted this was “just oneman’s opinion” but
the truth is that one man — known to be deeply religious
and long active in Jewish affairs — was the publisher
of an influential newspaper serving one of the
wealthiest andmost powerful communities in a pivotal
metropolitan area.
Although Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation
League (ADL) of B’nai B’rith and other Jewish lobby
kingpins denounced the candid opinions expressed
by one of their own, their outrage seemed to some observers
to bemore hinged on the fact that Adler’s honesty
too openly exposed the point that there is deep
anger toward Obama by those who perceive the president
to be hostile to Israel.
As far back as its July/August 2009 issue, Commentary, the magazine of the American Jewish Committee,
referred to Obama’s “turn against Israel” — just
one notable example of this mindset.
Adler’s viewpoint reflects the attitude of many in
the pro-Israel community, evidenced by heavy-handed
attacks on the president appearing in Jewish community
newspapers fromthe beginning of his presidency.
Chemi Shalev admitted in an essay in Israel’s Ha’aretz on Jan. 21 that Adler’s views do reflect the
thinking of what Shalev referred to as “many.”
Commenting that “Adler’s crazy and criminal suggestions
are not the ranting of some loony-tune individual
and were not taken out of thin air,” Shalev said
Adler’s anger was “the inevitable result of the inordinate
volume of repugnant venom” spewed at Obama
by “many who still believe he is a Muslim, who are
convinced that he wants to destroy Israel and who seriously
debate whether he is more like Ahmadinejad
than Arafat or . . . more like Hitler than Haman.”
Some speculate the Adler affair was stage-managed
from the start — a contrived provocation to stir
up more discussion in the Jewish community of
Obama’s intransigence toward Israel. Adler himself
said he “wanted to get a reaction,” and he did: Jewish
people across America are aware — now more than
ever — that many of their leaders are hostile to Obama
because of his policy toward Israel.
The Secret Service claims it is “investigating,” although
few believe Adler will be prosecuted. In the
meantime, Adler “resigned” as editor of his own newspaper
and put it up for sale.
The call for Obama’s assassination does come at a
time when pro-Israel voices are howling for Obama to
wage war against Iran on Israel’s behalf.
On Jan. 18, The Wall Street Journal — controlled
by hardline pro-Israel billionaire Rupert Murdoch —
published a screaming pro-war commentary titled “The Mortal Threat from Iran.” The author — Mark
Helprin — is an American conservative who holds
membership in the influential Council on Foreign Relations
and who is also a former member of both the
Israeli infantry and the Israeli air force.
Helprin declared that “any president of the United
States fit for the office . . . should order the armed
forces of the United States to attack and destroy the
Iranian nuclear weapons complex.”
Acknowledging Americans would suffer retaliatory
attacks from Iran, Helprin concluded it would be
worth the cost to put an end to such a “vengeful,martyrdom-obsessed state in the midst of a never-subsiding
fury against the West.”
This hysterical bellicosity appearing in the otherwise
staid Wall Street Journal is not out of the ordinary.
It is found inmuch of themedia as the pressure
for war escalates.
The question remains: Will Obama be intimidated
by the threats, or will he withstand the demands of
the powerful minority who want war?
. . ..Michael Collins Piper is the author of Final
Judgment, the controversial
“underground bestseller” documenting
the collaboration of Israeli intelligence in
the assassination of John F. Kennedy. He is
also the author of The New Babylon, The
High Priests of War, The
New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America ,
The
Judas Goats: The Enemy Within,
Dirty
Secrets: Crime, Conspiracy & Cover-Up in
the 20th Century,
The
GOLEM: Israel's Hell Bomb,
and Target:
Traficant. These works can
be found at America
First Books and FIRST
AMENDMENT BOOKS:
1-888-699-NEWS. He has lectured
on suppressed topics in places as diverse as
Malaysia, Japan, Canada, Russia and Abu Dhabi. |
|
(Issue Number 6, February 6, 2012,
AMERICAN
FREE PRESS)
|
|