Page
4, AMERICAN
FREE PRESS * November
29, 2010
* Issue 48 AMERICAN FREE PRESS
BEHIND THE SCENES WITH
MICHAEL COLLINS PIPER
|
Schoen and Caddell:
Democrat strategists want Obama to bow out now. Obama:
Weakened candidate. Clinton: Possible contender?
|
Push
to Dethrone Obama
Part of `Centrist' Agenda
By Michael Collins
Piper
 |
. Two
major, longtime Democratic Party political consultants
who have been key figures in the ongoing high-level
drive to launch a “centrist” third-party
movement — noted only by AMERICAN
FREE PRESS
— have publicly called for Barack
Obama to declare now that he will not be a candidate
for re-election in 2012. The consultants —
Doug Schoen and Patrick Caddell — laid down
their challenge in a prominently-placed commentary
in The Washington Post on Nov. 14.
 The
Post has long been a major political
force, under the control of the Meyer-Graham media
empire established by Eugene Meyer, a World War
I-era war profiteer. He was an early Federal Reserve
System governor and later aWorld Bank president.
The Post has been a voice for the London-based
Rothschild dynasty whose agents on American soil
— via the Kuhn-Loeb investment house —
directed the establishment of the Federal Reserve
System, the control of which has generated trillions
of dollars that enabled elitist families and financial
interests to grab control of the mass print and
broadcast media through which they have manipulated
the political arena.
The
call by Schoen and Caddell may appear to be “good
news” in the minds of Obama’s critics.
However, the campaign to delegitimize Obama is
part of broader scheme to fool Americans into
rallying behind an ostensibly independent movement
— a “controlled opposition”
— dominated by the same families and monied
interests that now control the two major parties.
Why
would these big money forces want to launch a
new “centrist” party? Good question.
Here’s the answer. The apparent —
and quite Machiavellian purpose — behind
this scheme appears to be to break the back of
the now-in-place traditional local, state and
federal political machines of both major parties
and their respective grassroots constituencies
(small business, farmers, public employees, minorities,
factory workers, etc). The “centrist”
party ushered into power would constitute an all-new
political superstructure at the national level
— divorced from the demands of grassroots
constituencies. It would be a mechanism of power
answering only to the controllers of the major
media who conjured up the “centrist”
party in the first place. It would direct the
future course of American affairs, in the guise
of ending “partisan gridlock,” while
actually ensuring that the international big-money
forces maintain their stranglehold on America.
It
is no coincidence that in 2008, Schoen published
a book, Declaring Independence: The Beginning
of the End of the Two-Party System, calling
for a new “centrist” party. He and
Caddell have been pushing that idea continuously
in a number of forums with — as AFP previously
noted — the collaboration of “establishment”
columnists in both the Post and New
York Times. Yet until now, those elite newspapers
never lent credence to third party advocates and
were notably hostile to them.
As
Schoen and Caddell wrote in the Post:
[It]
is clear, we believe, that the president has
largely lost the consent of the governed. The
midterm elections were effectively a referendum
on the Obama presidency. And even if it was
not an endorsement of a Republican vision for
America, the drubbing the Democrats took was
certainly a vote of no confidence in Obama and
his party. The president has almost no credibility
left with Republicans and little with independents..
We
are convinced that if Obama immediately declares
his intention not to run for reelection, he
will be able to unite the country, provide national
and international leadership, escape the hold
of the left, isolate the right and achieve results
that would be otherwise unachievable.
While
it is unlikely Obama will be cowed into abandoning
his reelection bid, the efforts by Schoen and
Caddell against him are nothing new. On July 28
in The Wall Street Journal — published
by Rupert Murdoch, longtime front man for the
Rothschild-financial network — Schoen and
Caddell called Obama “our divisive president”
and declared that while Obama had promised “a
new era of post-partisanship . . .[H]e’s
played racial politics and further split the country
along class and party lines,” extraordinary
allegations from two Democrats long involved in
the civil rights movement. They wrote:
Rather
than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided
America on the basis of race, class and partisanship.
Moreover, his cynical approach to governance
has encouraged his allies to pursue a similar
strategy of racially divisive politics on his
behalf.
We
have seen the divisive approach under Republican
presidents as well — particularly the
administrations of Richard Nixon and George
W. Bush. It was wrong then, and it is wrong
now. By dividing America, Mr. Obama has brought
our government to the brink of a crisis of legitimacy,
compromising our ability to address our most
important policy issues. . . .
President
Obama’s divisive approach to governance
has weakened us as a people and paralyzed our
political culture. Meanwhile, the Republican
leadership has failed to put forth an agenda
that is more positive, unifying or inclusive.
We are stronger when we debate issues and purpose,
and we are all weaker when we divide by race
and class. We will pay a price for this type
of politics.
This
rhetoric, in fact, has been central to the ongoing
push for the new “centrist” third
party. For example, on Nov. 12 The NewYork
Times again sounded the call for a centrist
rebellion. A commentary by David Brooks, a Jewish
Republican “neo-conservative”—the
Times’ op-ed page “in house”
conservative — said a “national greatness
agenda” would be promoted by “the
next big social movement.” It would reject
the views of “orthodox liberals and conservatives”
and end “hyper-partisanship.” Brooks
said “the coming movement may be a third
party or it may support serious people in the
existing two” and preserve American “supremacy”—that
is, global interventionism.
This
concept of “national greatness” has
been promoted in Rupert Murdoch’s Weekly
Standard by Marshall Wittmann, a Jewish Trotskyite-turned
neoconservative who directed the Christian Coalition
and later signed on with Sen. Joseph Lieberman
(Conn.) the vaunted Democrat-turned-independent
hailed as a model for nonpartisan “centrist”
politics.
While
it is speculation at this point, it appears that
the ultimate intent is to damage Obama politically,
casting him as a failed president who represents
the extreme “left,” while at the same
time (as AFP has reported on the Washington
Post-Newsweek empire’s promotion
of Sarah Palin) catapulting Mrs. Palin to the
2012 Republican presidential nomination.
At
that time the major media could declare both candidates
— Obama and Mrs. Palin — as “extremists”
and “damaged goods,” and push the
emergence of a centrist party to rise up and challenge
the two major parties.
If
he does try for re-election, Obama could face
a challenge for renomination from within his own
party — Hillary Clinton being a likely rival
— but dethroning an incumbent president
has never been a simple proposition. If Obama
is renominated, in any case, he will be so as
a very crippled incumbent.
* * * * * * *
. . ..Michael Collins Piper can
be heard every week day night live on
the Internet at republicbroadcasting.org.
He is the author of Final
Judgment, the controversial
“underground bestseller”
documenting the collaboration of Israeli
intelligence in the assassination of
John F. Kennedy. He is also the author
of The
High Priests of War,
The
New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America
, The
Judas Goats: The Enemy Within,
Dirty
Secrets: Crime, Conspiracy & Cover-Up
in the 20th Century,
The
GOLEM: Israel's Hell Bomb,
and Target:
Traficant. These
works can be found at America
First Books and FIRST
AMENDMENT
BOOKS: 1-888-699-NEWS.
He has lectured on suppressed
topics in places as diverse as Malaysia,
Japan, Canada, Russia and Abu Dhabi. |
|
(Issue #48, November 29, 2010, AMERICAN
FREE PRESS)
|
|
